Larry Hunt's Bible Commentary


    SWEET RIVER FOOL - Alcoholic, homeless, and alone, Snody despaired of life until a seemingly chance encounter with Saint Francis of Assisi led him to the joys of Christ and the redemption of his soul…

  • THE GLORY OF KINGS - A proposal for why God will always be the best explanation for the existence of the universe.

  • ENOCH WALKED WITH GOD - Enoch had a beautiful soul and walked with God in many ways. This book invites children to imagine what some of those ways might have been while presenting them with a wonderful model for their own lives.

  • Advertisements
  • Stats

    • 12,603 visits since Nov 2009
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 453 other followers

I Kings 10

Chapter 10

v. 26: Statements like this confirm my suspicions that the author of Kings is critical of Solomon, even when he does not criticize him overtly as he does in the next chapter.  Solomon’s actions here are a direct violation of Deuteronomy 17:16, not only because he is gathering horses and chariots but also because he is getting them from Egypt.  In fact, the wording of Deuteronomy and Kings is so similar, here and elsewhere, that it is very likely that the author of Kings had the book of Deuteronomy in mind as he wrote Kings.[1] For examples of other similar wording, compare the blessings and curses in chapter 8:33 and following with Deuteronomy 28.  Note also the place “God chooses to dwell” (Deuteronomy 12:5 and 1st Kings 11:36).

[1] This theory is much more acceptable to me than the one which suggests that the author of Kings himself actually wrote sections of Deuteronomy with Solomon in mind.  The latter theory presumes a certain degree of dishonesty on the part of the author of Kings by making him a forger who inserted his own beliefs into Deuteronomy as though Moses himself had set them down.  My theory assumes that the author is only recognizing in Solomon the fulfillment of Deuteronomy’s prediction.  Good writers often allude to earlier, authoritative works by mimicking their style and wording; I see no reason to believe this is not the case here.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: